Screencast-O-Matic is a tool to create and share screen recordings.
The top three of Screencast-O-Matic’s competitors in the Session Recording And Playback category are FullStory with 50.70%, etracker with 18.09%, LogRocket with 11.42% market share.
Compare Tech Stack of Screencast-O-Matic and Its Competitors
Get the list of top 5 common technologies used by Screencast-O-Matic and its competitors.Get Free Report
Around the world in 2022, over 111 companies have started using Screencast-O-Matic as Session Recording And Playback tool.
Find which Screencast-O-Matic customers are ready to buy from you by using Slintel's buying intent score.
The three top industries that use Screencast-O-Matic for Session Recording And Playback are Education (14), Higher Education (9), Business (8).
The majority of Screencast-O-Matic’s customers for the session-recording-and-playback category fall in the company size of 1,000 - 4,999 employees (38 companies), 500 - 999 employees (14 companies), 10,000+ employees (13 companies).
The top three geographies of Screencast-O-Matic for session-recording-and-playback are the United States with 100(84.03%), United Kingdom with 5(4.20%), Canada with 2(1.68%) customers respectively.
Download Slintel’s Chrome Extension to get verified contact data of Screencast-O-Matic employees.Install Now
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Screencast-O-Matic’s Top competitors in the session-recording-and-playback category are FullStory, etracker, LogRocket. You can view a full list of Screencast-O-Matic competitors. Slintel uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and of Screencast-O-Matic and 40,000 other technologies on the internet.You can also compare Screencast-O-Matic and its feature with top competitors here : .
The majority of Screencast-O-Matic’s customers for the session-recording-and-playback category fall in the company size of 1,000 - 4,999 employees (38 companies), 500 - 999 employees (14 companies), 10,000+ employees (13 companies). You can view a distribution chart of Screencast-O-Matic customers by company size.
Screencast-O-Matic has market share of 0.46% in session-recording-and-playback market. Screencast-O-Matic competes with 41 competitor tools in session-recording-and-playback category. The top alternatives for Screencast-O-Matic session-recording-and-playback tool are FullStory with 50.70%, etracker with 18.09%, LogRocket with 11.42% market share.
Top industries that use Screencast-O-Matic for session-recording-and-playback are Education (14), Higher Education (9), Business (8).
Around the world in 2022, over 111 companies have started using Screencast-O-Matic as session-recording-and-playback tool. Companies using Screencast-O-Matic for session-recording-and-playback are majorly from United States with 100 customers. 84.03% of Screencast-O-Matic customers are from the United States. Other top countries using Screencast-O-Matic are United Kingdom and Canada with 5(4.20%) and 2(1.68%) customers respectively.
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.