Comparing the customer bases of LogRocket and Screencast-O-Matic we can see that LogRocket has 2990 customers, while Screencast-O-Matic has 132 customers. In the Session Recording And Playback category, with 2990 customers LogRocket stands at 4th place by ranking, while Screencast-O-Matic with 132 customers, is at the 12th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing LogRocket and Screencast-O-Matic customers based on their geographic location, we can see that LogRocket has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada , while Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of LogRocket vs Screencast-O-Matic’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
LogRocket and Screencast-O-Matic compete against each other in the Session Recording And Playback, Audience Insights .
In the Session Recording And Playback market, LogRocket has a 10.35% market share in comparison to Screencast-O-Matic’s 0.46%. Since it has a better market share coverage, LogRocket holds the 4th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Session Recording And Playback category, while Screencast-O-Matic holds the 12th spot.
LogRocket has 2990 customers and Screencast-O-Matic has 132 customers in the Session Recording And Playback segment. LogRocket has 2858 more customers than Screencast-O-Matic in this category.
LogRocket has more customers in
Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.