Comparing the customer bases of FullStory and Screencast-O-Matic we can see that FullStory has 14313 customers, while Screencast-O-Matic has 126 customers. In the Session Recording And Playback category, with 14313 customers FullStory stands at 1st place by ranking, while Screencast-O-Matic with 126 customers, is at the 12th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing FullStory and Screencast-O-Matic customers based on their geographic location, we can see that FullStory has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Australia , while Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of FullStory vs Screencast-O-Matic’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
FullStory and Screencast-O-Matic compete against each other in the Session Recording And Playback, Audience Insights .
In the Session Recording And Playback market, FullStory has a 49.58% market share in comparison to Screencast-O-Matic’s 0.44%. Since it has a better market share coverage, FullStory holds the 1st spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Session Recording And Playback category, while Screencast-O-Matic holds the 12th spot.
FullStory has 14313 customers and Screencast-O-Matic has 126 customers in the Session Recording And Playback segment. FullStory has 14187 more customers than Screencast-O-Matic in this category.
FullStory has more customers in
Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.