Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing FullStory and Screencast-O-Matic customers based on their geographic location, we can see that FullStory has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Australia , while Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of FullStory vs Screencast-O-Matic’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
FullStory and Screencast-O-Matic compete against each other in the Session Recording And Playback, Audience Insights .
In the Session Recording And Playback market, FullStory has a 48.94% market share in comparison to Screencast-O-Matic’s 0.56%. Since it has a better market share coverage, FullStory holds the 1st spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Session Recording And Playback category, while Screencast-O-Matic holds the 11th spot.
FullStory has 10434 customers and Screencast-O-Matic has 120 customers in the Session Recording And Playback segment. FullStory has 10314 more customers than Screencast-O-Matic in this category.
FullStory has more customers in
United States
,
United Kingdom
and
Australia
.
Screencast-O-Matic has more customers in
United States
,
United Kingdom
and
Canada
.
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.