Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing Campaign Monitor and Pipedrive customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Campaign Monitor has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Australia , while Pipedrive has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Brazil .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Campaign Monitor vs Pipedrive’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Campaign Monitor and Pipedrive compete against each other in the Customer Experience, Personalization Behavioral Targeting, Analytics, Campaign Management, Contact Management .
In the Personalization Behavioral Targeting market, Campaign Monitor has a 13.54% market share in comparison to Pipedrive’s 3.03%. Since it has a better market share coverage, Campaign Monitor holds the 3rd spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Personalization Behavioral Targeting category, while Pipedrive holds the 8th spot.
Campaign Monitor has 45044 customers and Pipedrive has 10072 customers in the Personalization Behavioral Targeting segment. Campaign Monitor has 34972 more customers than Pipedrive in this category.
Campaign Monitor has more customers in
United States
,
United Kingdom
and
Australia
.
Pipedrive has more customers in
United States
,
United Kingdom
and
Brazil
.
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.