Discover DataPlay Market Research tool - Top alternatives, customer information and buyer intent data. Compare DataPlay with the biggest competitors in the Market Research market like SurveyMonkey Typeform etc.
Find customers using DataPlay. Additionally, find customers with upcoming contract renewals and propensity to buy similar technologies.
Discover competitors of DataPlay to find prospects, market share, technology movements, buying patterns and compare technologies against each other.
Look up customers for DataPlay using Employee Count. Know their target company size to create targeted sales and marketing campaigns.
Understand primary industries that DataPlay sells to and new
industries they are tapping into
Find customers using DataPlay by region, country, state,
city and pin codes.
DataPlay’s Top competitors in the market-research category are SurveyMonkey Typeform Qualtrics. You can view a full list of DataPlay competitors here. Slintel uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of DataPlay and 40,000 other technologies on the internet.You can also compare DataPlay and its feature with top competitors here : DataPlay vs SurveyMonkey DataPlay vs Typeform DataPlay vs Qualtrics .
Majority of DataPlay’s customers for the market-research category fall in the company size of 1-10 employees (1 companies) 11-50 employees (1 companies) . You can view a distribution chart of DataPlay customers by company size here.
DataPlay has market share of 0.00% in market-research market. DataPlay competes with 109 competitor tools in market-research category. Top alternatives for DataPlay market-research tool are SurveyMonkey with 33.13% Typeform with 23.67% Qualtrics with 8.36% market share.
Around the world in 2021, over 2 companies have started using DataPlay as market-research tool. Companies using DataPlay for market-research are majorly from United States with 2 customers. 100.00% of DataPlay customers are from the United States. Other top countries using DataPlay are with customers respectively.