Comparing the customer bases of SharpSpring and Net-Results we can see that SharpSpring has 13733 customers, while Net-Results has 50 customers. In the Lead Management category, with 13733 customers SharpSpring stands at 11th place by ranking, while Net-Results with 50 customers, is at the 105th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing SharpSpring and Net-Results customers based on their geographic location, we can see that SharpSpring has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Netherlands , while Net-Results has more customers in United States , Colombia and Slovenia .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of SharpSpring vs Net-Results’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
SharpSpring and Net-Results compete against each other in the Lead Management, Marketing Automation Platforms, Online Marketing, Predictive Lead Scoring, Campaign Management .
In the Lead Management market, SharpSpring has a 2.84% market share in comparison to Net-Results’s 0.01%. Since it has a better market share coverage, SharpSpring holds the 11th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Lead Management category, while Net-Results holds the 105th spot.
SharpSpring has 13733 customers and Net-Results has 50 customers in the Lead Management segment. SharpSpring has 13683 more customers than Net-Results in this category.
SharpSpring has more customers in
Net-Results has more customers in United States , Colombia and Slovenia .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.