Comparing the customer bases of Phaser and Panda.js we can see that Phaser has 380 customers, while Panda.js has 11 customers. In the Game Development category, with 380 customers Phaser stands at 10th place by ranking, while Panda.js with 11 customers, is at the 87th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing Phaser and Panda.js customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Phaser has more customers in United States Tunisia India , while Panda.js has more customers in China .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Phaser vs Panda.js’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Phaser and Panda.js compete against each other in the Game Development .
In the Game Development market, Phaser has a 1.15% market share in comparison to Panda.js’s 0.03%. Since it has a better market share coverage, Phaser holds the 10th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Game Development category, while Panda.js holds the 87th spot.
Phaser has 380 customers and Panda.js has 11 customers in the Game Development segment. Phaser has 369 more customers than Panda.js in this category.
Phaser has more customers in
Panda.js has more customers in China .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.