Comparing the customer bases of LibGDX and Phaser we can see that LibGDX has 300 customers, while Phaser has 235 customers. In the Game Development category, with 300 customers LibGDX stands at 12th place by ranking, while Phaser with 235 customers, is at the 15th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing LibGDX and Phaser customers based on their geographic location, we can see that LibGDX has more customers in United States , India and Spain , while Phaser has more customers in United States , India and United Kingdom .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of LibGDX vs Phaser’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
LibGDX and Phaser compete against each other in the Game Development .
In the Game Development market, LibGDX has a 0.86% market share in comparison to Phaser’s 0.67%. Since it has a better market share coverage, LibGDX holds the 12th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Game Development category, while Phaser holds the 15th spot.
LibGDX has 300 customers and Phaser has 235 customers in the Game Development segment. LibGDX has 65 more customers than Phaser in this category.
LibGDX has more customers in
Phaser has more customers in United States , India and United Kingdom .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.