Technologies / Google Gaming Vs Stencyl
Last update : Apr 27 2022

Google Gaming Vs Stencyl : In-Depth Comparison

Not sure if Google Gaming, or Stencyl is the better choice for your needs? No problem! Slintel comparison helps you make the best decision. Take a look at categories where Google Gaming and Stencyl compete, current customers, market share, category ranking. Still uncertain? Compare the similarities and differences between Google Gaming vs Stencyl customers by industry, by geography and by buying patterns.
tech-vs-img
  • Overview
  • Current Customers
  • Market Share
  • Geography
  • Customer Movements
  • FAQs
  • Copy link
  • Bookmark this page
    Save for later
  • Copy link
  • Bookmark this page

Google Gaming

Google Gaming competes with other products in the Game Development categories. It has a market share in the Game Development category, and Google Gaming has 2676 customers in 95 countries.

Stencyl

Stencyl competes with other products in the Project Collaboration, categories. It has a market share in the Game Development category, and Stencyl has 320 customers in 37 countries.

Categories where Google Gaming and Stencyl compete

Choose Technologies to compare

  • Google Gaming
  • Stencyl
Divider Divider
  • Discord
  • Unreal Engine
  • OBS
  • Unity
  • Godot
  • Kahoot!
  • GameMaker
  • Chartboost
  • Phaser
  • BabylonJS
  • Bandicam
  • LibGDX
  • GameAnalytics
  • Mod.io
  • BeamNG
  • PlayFab
  • GameSalad
  • CRYENGINE
  • LOVE
  • Box2D
  • Kivy
  • Ren'Py
  • Cocos2d-X
  • Spring RTS
  • MonoGame
  • PlayCanvas
  • CodeAndWeb
  • BuildBox
  • FMOD
  • GameSparks
  • Photon
  • ImpactJS
  • Kaneva
  • Anvil
  • Flixel
  • devtodev
  • SpeedTree for Games
  • Panda3D
  • ioquake3
  • Gamua Starling
  • AndEngine
  • 4A Engine
  • ThinkGaming
  • Marmalade
  • AppGameKit
  • GoPlay (Formerly Smartpixel)
  • HaxeFlixel
  • Pragma
  • Allegro library
  • CraftyJS
  • Blender
  • Action!
  • Moai
  • jMonkeyEngine
  • melonJS
  • Azure PlayFab
  • Quantic Foundry
  • Amazon Lumberyard
  • V-Play
  • GameRefinery
  • GDevelop
  • Kythera
  • WorldForge
  • HeroEngine
  • AccelByte
  • ClanLib SDK
  • Corona SDK
  • Leadwerks
  • Beamable
  • Goo Create
  • Game of Whales
  • AutoDesk StingRay
  • Gamebryo
  • PhysicsJS
  • Kiwi.js
  • ChilliConnect
  • Crystal Space
  • Bidshake
  • Sparrow Game Engine
  • Turbulenz
  • Multiplay
  • Xenko
  • Cafu Engine
  • Shiva Engine
  • Panda.js
  • Polycode
  • BINK
  • JOGL
  • ORX
  • ZGameEditor
  • Torque 3D
  • DimensioneX
  • Stage.js
  • OpenGEX
  • Object Oriented Input System
  • RPG Maker VX Ace
  • id Tech
  • FIFE
  • Oxygine
  • Antiryad Gx
  • Duality
  • dim3
  • Vanda Engine
  • Metaplay
  • Applicasa
  • Solpeo
  • indielib
  • ZenGL
  • Cocos2d
  • Build engine
  • Construct
  • Havok Cloth
  • Game Closure
  • Flox
  • Maratis
  • Gamelogic
  • BatteryTech
  • TentuPlay
  • AppWarp
  • Whitestorm.js
  • LoomSDK
  • GamePlay
  • Angel2D
  • Autodesk Gamedev
  • QICI Engine
  • Grit
  • Yokozuna Data

Comparing the customer bases of Google Gaming and Stencyl

Comparing the customer bases of Google Gaming and Stencyl we can see that Google Gaming has 2676 customers, while Stencyl has 320 customers. In the Game Development category, with 2676 customers Google Gaming stands at 4th place by ranking, while Stencyl with 320 customers, is at the 16th place.

Google Gaming
4 th
2676 Customer
Stencyl
16 th
320 Customer

Comparing the market share of Google Gaming and Stencyl

Google Gaming has a 8.09% market share in the Game Development category, while Stencyl has a 0.97% market share in the same space.

8.09%

Google Gaming

0.97%

Stencyl

Customer Technology Stack Analysis

Find out what companies are built with

Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.

Compare Google Gaming vs Stencyl customers by geography

Comparing Google Gaming and Stencyl customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Google Gaming has more customers in United States Uruguay India , while Stencyl has more customers in United States United Arab Emirates India .

Google Gaming
Stencyl

Customer Movements for this month

Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Google Gaming vs Stencyl’s target audience.

Google Gaming
Stencyl

FAQ

Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.

What are the different markets in which Google Gaming and Stencyl compete against each other?

Google Gaming and Stencyl compete against each other in the Game Development .

How does the market share of Google Gaming and Stencyl compare in the Game Development market?

In the Game Development market, Google Gaming has a 8.09% market share in comparison to Stencyl’s 0.97%. Since it has a better market share coverage, Google Gaming holds the 4th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Game Development category, while Stencyl holds the 16th spot.

How many customers are acquired by Google Gaming and Stencyl in the Game Development segment?

Google Gaming has 2676 customers and Stencyl has 320 customers in the Game Development segment. Google Gaming has 2356 more customers than Stencyl in this category.

What are the countries in which Google Gaming and Stencyl has more customers?

Google Gaming has more customers in United States Uruguay India .
Stencyl has more customers in United States United Arab Emirates India .

Choose Technologies to compare

  • logo
    Cloudflare DNS
    logo
    Tableau Software
    logo
    Pardot
    logo
    Drift
    logo
    Criteo
    logo
    Shopify
    logo
    Microsoft Azure DNS
Divider Divider
Slintel Chrome Extension

Save 15 hours a week on sales research

Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.

  • Compare technology
  • Technologies
  • Categories