Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing Sift Science and SAS Anti-Money Laundering customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Sift Science has more customers in United States Zimbabwe India , while SAS Anti-Money Laundering has more customers in United States Taiwan United Kingdom .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Sift Science vs SAS Anti-Money Laundering’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Sift Science and SAS Anti-Money Laundering compete against each other in the Financial Fraud Detection Big Data Cloud Security Employee Engagement Financial Reporting .
In the Financial Fraud Detection market, Sift Science has a 18.35% market share in comparison to SAS Anti-Money Laundering’s 2.34%. Since it has a better market share coverage, Sift Science holds the 3rd spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Financial Fraud Detection category, while SAS Anti-Money Laundering holds the 4th spot.
Sift Science has 3696 customers and SAS Anti-Money Laundering has 471 customers in the Financial Fraud Detection segment. Sift Science has 3225 more customers than SAS Anti-Money Laundering in this category.
Sift Science has more customers in
United States
Zimbabwe
India
.
SAS Anti-Money Laundering has more customers in
United States
Taiwan
United Kingdom
.
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.