Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing IBM FileNet and OpenText Core customers based on their geographic location, we can see that IBM FileNet has more customers in United States , India and Italy , while OpenText Core has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of IBM FileNet vs OpenText Core’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
IBM FileNet and OpenText Core compete against each other in the Enterprise Content Management, Document Management System .
In the Enterprise Content Management market, IBM FileNet has a 2.41% market share in comparison to OpenText Core’s 0.51%. Since it has a better market share coverage, IBM FileNet holds the 3rd spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Enterprise Content Management category, while OpenText Core holds the 8th spot.
IBM FileNet has 1759 customers and OpenText Core has 374 customers in the Enterprise Content Management segment. IBM FileNet has 1385 more customers than OpenText Core in this category.
IBM FileNet has more customers in
United States
,
India
and
Italy
.
OpenText Core has more customers in
United States
,
United Kingdom
and
Canada
.
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.