Discover Braid Employee Scheduling tool - Top alternatives, customer information and buyer intent data. Compare Braid with the biggest competitors in the Employee Scheduling market like Crew Square Appointments etc.
Find customers using Braid. Additionally, find customers with upcoming contract renewals and propensity to buy similar technologies.
Discover competitors of Braid to find prospects, market share, technology movements, buying patterns and compare technologies against each other.
Look up customers for Braid using Employee Count. Know their target company size to create targeted sales and marketing campaigns.
Understand primary industries that Braid sells to and new
industries they are tapping into
Find customers using Braid by region, country, state,
city and pin codes.
Braid’s Top competitors in the employee-scheduling category are Crew Square Appointments Calendly. You can view a full list of Braid competitors here. Slintel uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Braid and 40,000 other technologies on the internet.You can also compare Braid and its feature with top competitors here : Braid vs Crew Braid vs Square Appointments Braid vs Calendly .
Majority of Braid’s customers for the employee-scheduling category fall in the company size of 1-10 employees (5 companies) 11-50 employees (3 companies) . You can view a distribution chart of Braid customers by company size here.
Braid has market share of 0.01% in employee-scheduling market. Braid competes with 99 competitor tools in employee-scheduling category. Top alternatives for Braid employee-scheduling tool are Crew with 32.12% Square Appointments with 16.73% Calendly with 11.99% market share.
Around the world in 2021, over 8 companies have started using Braid as employee-scheduling tool. Companies using Braid for employee-scheduling are majorly from United Kingdom with 5 customers. 62.50% of Braid customers are from the United Kingdom. Other top countries using Braid are United States with 3(37.50%) customers respectively.