Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing Structural and EasyGrouper customers based on their geographic location, we can see that Structural has more customers in United States , India and United Kingdom , while EasyGrouper has more customers in and United States .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of Structural vs EasyGrouper’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Structural and EasyGrouper compete against each other in the Employee Directory, 360 Degree Feedback, Employee Engagement, Instant Messaging And Chat, Onboarding .
In the Employee Directory market, Structural has a 27.93% market share in comparison to EasyGrouper’s 0.01%. Since it has a better market share coverage, Structural holds the 2nd spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Employee Directory category, while EasyGrouper holds the 0 spot.
Structural has 2840 customers and EasyGrouper has 1 customers in the Employee Directory segment. Structural has 2839 more customers than EasyGrouper in this category.
Structural has more customers in
United States
,
India
and
United Kingdom
.
EasyGrouper has more customers in
and
United States
.
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.