Catogories where IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete


filter icon
179

IBM Content Manager OnDemand

32

OpenText InfoArchive

Current Customers

Comparing the customer bases of IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive, we can see that IBM Content Manager OnDemand has 179 customers, while OpenText InfoArchive has 32 customers.

0.71%

IBM Content Manager OnDemand

0.13%

OpenText InfoArchive

Market Share

IBM Content Manager OnDemand has a 0.71% market share in the Archiving category, while OpenText InfoArchive has a 0.13% market share in the same space.

IBM Content Manager OnDemand

9 th

OpenText InfoArchive

14 th

Category Ranking

In the Archiving category, with 179 customers IBM Content Manager OnDemand stands at 9th place by ranking, while OpenText InfoArchive with 32 customers, is at the 14th place.

Want more insights about IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive?

Compare IBM Content Manager OnDemand vs OpenText InfoArchive customers by industry

Comparing IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive customers by industry, we can see that IBM Content Manager OnDemand has more customers from the Banking Cloud Business Intelligence industries, while OpenText InfoArchive has more customers in Banking Cloud Business Intelligence industries.

Industry IBM Content Manager OnDemand Customers OpenText InfoArchive Customers
Banking 7 2
Cloud 5 1
Business Intelligence 4 1
Commercial Banking 4 1
insurance 4 2
Consulting 3 1
Digital Transformation 3 1
Want more insights about IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive contact us

Compare IBM Content Manager OnDemand vs OpenText InfoArchive customers by geography

Comparing IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive customers based on their geographic location, we can see that IBM Content Manager OnDemand has more customers in United States Spain Canada , while OpenText InfoArchive has more customers in United States United Kingdom Finland .

filter icon
Get more detailed information about IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive customer base.

Compare IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive with other technologies

Compare technologies in Archiving with IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive on the basis of market share, customers and industry

vs
FAQs

What are the different markets in which IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete against each other?

IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compete against each other in the Archiving .

How does the market share of IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive compare in the Archiving market?

In the Archiving market, IBM Content Manager OnDemand has a 0.71% market share in comparison to OpenText InfoArchive’s 0.13%. Since it has a better market share coverage, IBM Content Manager OnDemand holds the 9th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Archiving category, while OpenText InfoArchive holds the 14th spot.

How many customers are acquired by IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive in the Archiving segment?

IBM Content Manager OnDemand has 179 customers and OpenText InfoArchive has 32 customers in the Archiving segment. IBM Content Manager OnDemand has 147 more customers than OpenText InfoArchive in this category.

What are the countries in which IBM Content Manager OnDemand and OpenText InfoArchive has more customers?

IBM Content Manager OnDemand has more customers in United States Spain Canada .
OpenText InfoArchive has more customers in United States United Kingdom Finland .

Use Slintel to get in touch with the best prospects for your business