Comparing the customer bases of SignalFX and Timber we can see that SignalFX has 617 customers, while Timber has 46 customers. In the Application Performance Monitoring category, with 617 customers SignalFX stands at 11th place by ranking, while Timber with 46 customers, is at the 45th place.
Instantly reveal the technology stack of any website. Generate a free report by analyzing a list of your customers to find the top 5 common technologies currently being used across your customers.
Comparing SignalFX and Timber customers based on their geographic location, we can see that SignalFX has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Canada , while Timber has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Netherlands .
Gain actionable insights about the buying patterns of SignalFX vs Timber’s target audience.
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
SignalFX and Timber compete against each other in the Application Performance Monitoring, Application Monitoring, Log Management .
In the Application Performance Monitoring market, SignalFX has a 0.92% market share in comparison to Timber’s 0.07%. Since it has a better market share coverage, SignalFX holds the 11th spot in Slintel’s Market Share Ranking Index for the Application Performance Monitoring category, while Timber holds the 45th spot.
SignalFX has 617 customers and Timber has 46 customers in the Application Performance Monitoring segment. SignalFX has 571 more customers than Timber in this category.
SignalFX has more customers in
Timber has more customers in United States , United Kingdom and Netherlands .
Get free emails, firmographics, technographics, and keyword intent from any website. Qualify leads on the go. Do intelligent outreaches and close deals faster.